200 Proofs that Eric Dubay is a liar and an idiot

"Over the years NASA has twice changed their story regarding the shape of the Earth. At first they maintained Earth was a perfect sphere, which later changed to an “oblate spheroid” flattened at the poles, and then changed again to being “pear-shaped” as the Southern hemisphere allegedly bulges out as well. Unfortunately for NASA, however, none of their official pictures show an oblate spheroid or pear-shaped Earth! All their pictures, contrary to their words, show a spherical (and clearly CGI fake) Earth." What is it with flat earthers and their NASA fixation!  Here Dubay exaggerates extravagantly in order to make people believe his lame proof It was widely accepted that the Earth was a sphere since the 12th century and Isaac Newton 1643-1727 first proposed that Earth was an oblate spheroid, confirmed by measurements soon after.  A little early for NASA to be involved. Earth as an oblate sphere NASA’s IGY Vanguard I satellite launched in 1958 did indeed show that ...

"In the documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon,” you can watch official leaked NASA footage showing Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins, for almost an hour, using transparencies and camera-tricks to fake shots of a round Earth! They communicate over audio with control in Houston about how to accurately stage the shot, and someone keeps prompting them on how to effectively manipulate the camera to achieve the desired effect. First, they blacked out all the windows except for a downward facing circular one, which they aimed the camera towards from several feet away. This created the illusion of a ball-shaped Earth surrounded by the blackness of space, when in fact it was simply a round window in their dark cabin. Neil Armstrong claimed at this point to be 130,000 miles from Earth, half-way to the Moon, but when camera-tricks were finished the viewer could see for themselves the astro-nots were not more than a couple dozen miles ab...

"When NASA’s images of the ball-Earth are compared with one another the coloration of the land/oceans and relative size of the continents are consistently so drastically different from one another as to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the pictures are all fake." Enhanced images Many of the images of Earth are documented as being colour enhanced.  Others are documented as unenhanced.   It is obvious that you cannot prove anything by comparing the colour of these two types of images. Both the images above are used frequently on the Internet, but unfortunately I have not been able to find the sources to confirm that the left hand image is enhanced and the right hand image is unenhanced.  However if you look at the colour of the images shown in the following two links it would suggest that the image on the left is indeed enhanced and the one on the right unenhanced.  Consequently comparing these two images proves nothing. https://epic.gsfc.na...

"NASA graphics artists have placed things like faces, dragons, and even the word “SEX” into cloud patterns over their various ball-Earth pictures. Their recent 2015 Pluto pictures even clearly have a picture of Disney’s “Pluto” the dog layered into the background. Such blatant fraud goes unnoticed by the hypnotized masses, but provides further proof of the illegitimacy of NASA and their spinning ball planet mythos." At best this proof proves that some images of Earth have been photoshopped ... something that NASA readily admits to.  It is not proof that ALL photos of Earth from space are fake. The example given by Dubay certainly does look edited, but it could also just be the tendency for humans to find patterns nature.  Unless Mr Dubay also blames NASA for every cloud that looks like a face or a puppy it is hard to be certain. http://www.amusingplanet.com/2012/04/clouds-that-look-like-things.html   If we assume that someone at NASA did phot...

"NASA has several alleged photographs of the ball-Earth which show several exact duplicate cloud patterns!  The likelihood of having two or three clouds of the exact same shape in the same picture is as likely as finding two or three people with exactly the same fingerprints. In fact it is solid proof that the clouds were copied and pasted in a computer program and that such pictures showing a ball- shaped Earth are fakes."  Yes we know.  Proves nothing This is the picture of Earth made famous by its inclusion on Iphones.  The history of this photo is well documented. https://qz.com/192700/the-guy-who-created-iphones-earth-image-explains-why-he-needed-to-fake-it/ Robert Simmon and Reto Stöckli, the two NASA employees who created this image, readily admit there are numerous fakeries in his image.   It's not a conspiracy if it is well documented, readily admitted and easily looked up by anyone who cares to. The image is a composite of strips ta...

"If you pick any cloud in the sky and watch for several minutes, two things will happen: the clouds will move and they will morph gradually changing shape. In official NASA footage of the spinning ball Earth, such as the “Galileo” time-lapse video however, clouds are constantly shown for 24+ hours at a time and not moving or morphing whatsoever! This is completely impossible, further proof that NASA produces fake CGI videos, and further evidence that Earth is not a spinning ball." Dubay does not understand the differences of scale When you look up at a cloudy sky you can make out individual clouds and see these clouds visibly forming, changing and dissipating. A satellite is much further away and does not pick out individual clouds.  Satellite photos only show global weather patterns. What may look like a completely blue area of sky on a satellite may have sparely spread clouds, and an area that looks like solid white clouds may have gaps of blue sky. So clouds may ...

"NASA claims there are upwards of 20,000 satellites floating around Earth’s upper-atmosphere sending us radio, television, GPS, and taking pictures of the planet. All these supposed satellite pictures, however, are admittedly “composite images, edited in photoshop!” They claim to receive “ribbons of imagery” from satellites which must then be spliced together to create composite images of the Earth, all of which are clearly CGI and not photographs. If Earth were truly a ball with 20,000 satellites orbiting, it would be a simple matter to mount a camera and take some real photographs. The fact that no real satellite photographs of the supposed ball Earth exist in favor of NASA’s “ribbons of composite CG imagery,” is further proof we are not being told the truth." Source:  https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Another lie.  Flat earthers analyse photos that NASA admits are photoshoped and surprise surprise they find evidence that they have been photoshoped.  Then they convenie...

"Analysis of many interior videos from the “International Space Station,” have shown the use of camera-tricks such as green-screens, harnesses and even wildly permed hair to achieve a zero-gravity type effect.  Footage of astronauts seemingly floating in the zero-gravity of their “space station” is indistinguishable from “vomit comet” Zero-G airplane footage. By flying parabolic maneuvers this Zero-G floating effect can be achieved over and over again then edited together. For longer uncut shots, NASA has been caught using simple wires and green screen technology." Again Dubay provides no evidence.  He seems to think that saying “I don’t believe NASA” constitutes a proof. "Footage of astronauts ... in the zero-gravity ... is indistinguishable from “vomit comet”" Lets discuss NASA's first space station Skylab rather than the ISS because the claims of faking are harder to support. First, the planes that none of the planes that were in operation up to 19...

"NASA and other space agencies have been caught time and again with air bubbles forming and floating off in their official “outer-space” footage. Astronauts have also been caught using scuba- space-gear, kicking their legs to move, and astronaut Luca Parmitano even almost drowned when water started filling up his helmet while allegedly on a “space-walk.” It is admitted that astronauts train for their “space-walks” in under- water training facilities like NASA’s “Neutral Buoyancy Lab,” but what is obvious from their “space bubbles,” and other blunders is that all official “space-walk” footage is also fake and filmed under- water."  Dubay provides no evidence as usual As Dubay admits the photo provided is a video of an astronaut training underwater, which makes sense since it gives them some idea of how it will feel when they are weightless in orbit.  If he has evidence of visible bubbles in space walk footage, why didn’t he include that instead? Obviously beca...

"It is claimed that the other planets are spheres and so therefore Earth must also be a sphere. Firstly, Earth is a “plane” not a “planet,” so the shape of these “planets” in the sky have no bearing on the shape of the Earth beneath our feet. Secondly, these “planets” have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wandering stars” since they differ from the other fixed stars in their  relative motions only. When looked at with an unprejudiced naked-eye or through a telescope, the fixed and wandering stars appear as luminous discs of light, NOT spherical terra firma. The pictures and videos shown by NASA of spherical terra firma planets are all clearly fake computer-generated images, and NOT photographs." Source:  https://petapixel.com/2015/01/30/shot-triple-transit-jupiters-moons-driveway-dslr/ More unsubstantiated opinion from Dubay.  Not a proof in sight. “... "planets" have been known for thousands of years around the world as the “wan...