200 Proofs that Eric Dubay is a liar and an idiot

"Astronomers say the magical magnetism of gravity is what keeps all the oceans of the world stuck to the ball-Earth. They claim that because the Earth is so massive, by virtue of this mass it creates a magic force able to hold people, oceans and atmosphere tightly clung to the underside of the spinning ball. Unfortunately, however, they cannot provide any practical example of this on a scale smaller than the planetary. A spinning wet tennis ball, for instance, has the exact opposite effect of the supposed ball-Earth! Any water poured over it simply falls off the sides, and giving it a spin results in water flying off 360 degrees like a dog shaking after a bath. Astronomers concede the wet tennis ball example displays the opposite effect of their supposed ball-Earth, but claim that at some unknown mass, the magic adhesive properties of gravity suddenly kick in allowing the spinning wet tennis ball-Earth to keep every drop of “gravitized” water stuck to the surface. When such an unp...

"If “gravity” magically dragged the atmosphere along with the spinning ball Earth, that would mean the atmosphere near the equator would be spinning around at over 1000 mph, the atmosphere over the mid-latitudes would be spinning around 500 mph, and gradually slower down to the poles where the atmosphere would be unaffected at 0 mph. In reality, however, the atmosphere at every point on Earth is equally unaffected by this alleged force, as it has never been measured or calculated and proven non-existent by the ability of airplanes to fly unabated in any direction without experiencing any such atmospheric changes." Dubay doesn’t understand gravity, friction or relative motion Just because Dubay does not understand gravity does not make it magic.  Gravity keeps the atmosphere from dissipating into space and from spinning off into space because of the rotation.  I.e. it counteracts the centrifugal force.   The atmosphere is rotated by friction with the ground and...

"Furthermore, the velocity and path of the Moon are uniform and should therefore exert a uniform influence on the Earth’s tides, when in actuality the Earth’s tides vary greatly and do not follow the Moon. Earth’s lakes, ponds, marshes and other inland bodies of water also inexplicably remain forever outside the Moon’s gravitational grasp! If  “gravity” was truly drawing Earth’s oceans up to it, all lakes, ponds and other bodies of standing water should certainly have tides as well." Dubay does not understand the mechanism that creates tides Dubay imagines that at high tide the Moon would always be at its apex.  However Dubays thinking is simplistic as usual because the tides are affected by other things than just the gravity of the Moon. The gravity of the Sun.  This is less of an effect than the Moon due to its distance, but it is there. The shape of the Earth.  The Earth is not a perfect sphere which causes gravity to vary slightly in different locations....

"Newton also theorized and it is now commonly taught that the Earth’s ocean tides are caused by gravitational lunar attraction. If the Moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter and the Earth 8,000 miles, however, using their own math and “law,” it follows that the Earth is 87 times more massive and therefore the larger object should attract the smaller to it, and not the other way around. If the Earth’s greater gravity is what keeps the Moon in orbit, it is impossible for the Moon’s lesser gravity to supersede the Earth’s gravity, especially at Earth’s sea-level, where its gravitational attraction would even further out-trump the Moon’s. And if the Moon’s gravity truly did supersede the Earth’s causing  the tides to be drawn towards it, there should be nothing to stop them from continuing onwards and upwards towards their great attractor." Not surprisingly Dubay does not understand how gravity works If Dubay is going to invoke science’s own "law", then he should at l...

"There has also never been a single experiment in history showing an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause another smaller mass to orbit around it.  The magic theory of gravity allows for oceans, buildings and people to remain forever stuck to the underside of a spinning ball while simultaneously causing objects like the Moon and satellites to remain locked in perpetual circular orbits around the Earth. If these were both true then people should be able to jump up and start orbiting circles around the Earth, or the Moon should have long ago been sucked into the Earth.  Neither of these theories have ever been experimentally verified and their alleged results are mutually exclusive."  More lies and childish reasoning from Dubay "There has also never been a single experiment in history showing an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause another smaller mass to orbit around it." The Moon and every satellite put into o...

"The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before knighted Freemason “Sir” Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of “gravity” upon the world.  It is a fact that objects placed in denser mediums rise up while objects placed in less dense mediums sink down. To fit with the heliocentric model which has no up or down, Newton instead claimed objects are attracted to large masses and fall towards the center. Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it as Newton claims “gravity” does with Earth, the Sun, Moon, Stars and Planets." Another blatant lie from Dubay “Not a Not a single experiment in history, however, has shown an object massive enough to, by virtue of its mass alone, cause other smaller masses to be attracted to it” Following links show ordinary people using the Cavendish experiment to show grav...

“If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular Earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures to swim through such forcefully held water.” This is similar to proof 32 .  Again a false and unsubstantiated claim with no supporting figures. Gravity does not need to be a strong force, it just needs to be stronger than any other force acting to throw us away from the earth.  The only other force that possibly do this is centrifugal force caused by the spinning earth.  It is no surprise that this force is much much weaker than gravity (At the equator It would only reduce a person’s weight by 0.3%). Think of it as a tug of war between two extremely feeble people.  The absolute strength of the people pulling is irrelevant.  The only thing that is important is which person is stronger.  The stronger person will inevitably and unstopably move the other person in their direction...

“If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world’s oceans, buildings, people and atmosphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for “gravity” to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and planes to take-off and travel freely unabated in any direction.” Yet another false and unsubstantiated claim.  As usual no figures are provided. How can the weak force of gravity also be strong enough to keep us on the earth?  It isn’t hard to figure out …  it is because the only other force acting on us to push us away from the earth, i.e. centrifugal force caused by the spinning earth, is even weaker.  E.g. At the equator It constitutes only 0.3% of a persons weight. Problem solved. Gravity is weak, but in the absence of any other significantly strong force acting on the oceans, atmosphere, buildings, and people it is enough to keep everything sufficiently grounded. In the unlikely ev...