200 Proofs that Eric Dubay is a liar and an idiot

"In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the ’’Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees. So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties." Dubay makes up more nonsense Dubay claims that this is a quote in the Lancet of 1856 …. I wonder if Mr Dubay puts as much credence in other things written in the Lancet in 1856.  Perhaps he would like to treat himself for any of the following using leaches as they did in the 1800’s:  tonsillitis; headaches; ear inf...

"The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay.  When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay. This proves that Sun and Moon light are different, unique, and opposites as they are in the geocentric flat model."  Dubay really is an imbecile to repeat this magic nonsense The moon’s light is septic?  The sun’s rays decrease combustion? (The authorities will be happy to hear that in forest/...