132. Sunlight and moonlight have different magical properties which means that moonlight can't be reflected sunlight

"The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay.  When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay. This proves that Sun and Moon light are different, unique, and opposites as they are in the geocentric flat model." 


Dubay really is an imbecile to repeat this magic nonsense

The moon’s light is septic?  The sun’s rays decrease combustion? (The authorities will be happy to hear that in forest/bush fire prone locations).  Substances exposed to moonlight show symptoms of putrification and decay? Seriously?

I’d like to see any evidence for any of those statements.  Haven’t got any?  What a surprise. There isn't any.  That is because it is just made up nonsense.

Maybe Dubay also subscribes to myths about sleeping in the light of a full Moon on certain nights causing a people to transform a person into a werewolf .  Personally I like the idea that Moonlight worsens the symptoms of lunatics because it  could explain some of Dubay's ramblings.


< Prev     131-140    Next >

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

127. Straight reflections of sunlight and moonlight are impossible on a spherical Earth

Image
"The fact that the Sun and Moon’s reflections on water always form a straight line path from the horizon to the observer proves the Earth is not a ball. If Earth’s surface was curved it would be impossible for the reflected light to curve over the ball from horizon to observer." This is a flawed argument because Dubay does not understand how reflections operate Although he doesn't describe it very well, I presume that Dubay is referring to the angle of reflection from a curved surface.  I.e. the curve of the Earth would mean that the angle of reflection off the surface would result in nearly all the light  not reaching the observer's eyes. The fact that, if this was how reflections worked, that the same would be true on a flat Earth seems to have escaped Dubay's notice. This type of reflection is called specular reflection, and takes place with mirror like surfaces.  Generally the surface of the water is not perfectly flat so the reflection of the light...
Read more

Debunking Eric Dubay's 200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball

Image
Conspiracy Baloney aims to provide resources to counter to the influence of the crazy anti-science conspiracy theories that are out there. This blog is specifically to debunk Eric Dubay's " 200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball", that I have found flat earthers often cite. There are quite a few resources out there that comprehensively debunk this book, but I think that one more voice can only help.  I have tried to keep the rebuttals as non technical as possible. Eric Dubay’s proofs are laughably simplistic and demonstrate an almost complete lack of understanding of maths and anything scientific or technical. A list of "proofs" that show Dubay is an idiot He also likes to give historical quotes as proofs.  Typical are quotes from the 1800’s but he even has one from before 1600!.  Not only are these opinions not proof of anything, but the fact that he can’t provide quotes from more up to date sources destroys their credibility. Worse, ...
Read more

1. The horizon always appears flat

Image
“The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.” Lazy thinking Our eyes are forward facing, with a very narrow field of vision.  While we can detect things in our peripheral vision what we see is very vague.  However we “feel” that we see a lot more than we do because our mind builds a more panoramic picture for us. Source:  https://www.eyehealthweb.com/peripheral-vision/ Think of the panoramic picture Apps that you can get for smartphones.  You take a narrow picture, then turn and take another and repeat.  The App then stitches these pictures together into one panoramic picture.  For us, our eyes are constantly moving left and right and it is our brain that is stitching together ...
Read more