58. The Belgium Antarctic Expedition was without Sun from May 17th to July 21st which is not possible on a spherical Earth

“The Royal Belgian Geographical Society in their “Expedition Antarctique Belge,” recorded that during the most severe part of the Antarctic winter, from 71 degrees South latitude onwards, the sun sets on May 17th and is not seen above the horizon again until July 21st! This is completely at odds with the ball-Earth theory, but easily explained by the flat-Earth model. The Midnight Sun is seen from high altitudes in extreme Northern latitudes during Arctic summer because the Sun, at its inner-most cycle, is circling tightly enough around the polar center that it remains visible above the horizon for someone at such a vantage point. Likewise, in extreme Southern latitudes during Arctic summer, the Sun completely disappears from view for over 2 months because there at the Northern Tropic, at the inner-most arc of its boomerang journey, the Sun is circling the Northern center too tightly to be seen from the Southern circumference.”

Dubay's claims that the Sun not being observed for that length of time is incompatible with a spherical Earth, but makes no attempt to explain why.  Just another lie from Dubay.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_Antarctic_Expedition

There are multiple web sites that calculate and predict the daylight hours for a particular location, date and time.

One such sight is www.timeanddate.com

Everyone on the Internet, including Mr Dubay and his fellow flat earthers are welcome to try this for their location to check how accurate it is.  They will find that it is very accurate, cloud cover permitting.

The key thing to note is that these web sites predict sunrise and sunset based on the Earth being a rotating sphere orbiting the Sun, so any calculation the it produces is by definition completely compatible with "ball-Earth theory".

So let us look at the calculated sunset and sunrise for the Belgium Antarctic Expedition 1897-1899.
The Neumayer Antarctic station is on roughly the same latitude as the Belgian Antarctic Expedition was when it became ice bound, 70.6 degrees south.

 In 1897,1898 and 1899 the calculated 24 hour night at this location began on May 21st and lasted until July 23rd.

See:
Not an exact match but hardly “completely at odds” with the Earth being a sphere.


< Prev  51-60 Next >

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

127. Straight reflections of sunlight and moonlight are impossible on a spherical Earth

Image
"The fact that the Sun and Moon’s reflections on water always form a straight line path from the horizon to the observer proves the Earth is not a ball. If Earth’s surface was curved it would be impossible for the reflected light to curve over the ball from horizon to observer." This is a flawed argument because Dubay does not understand how reflections operate Although he doesn't describe it very well, I presume that Dubay is referring to the angle of reflection from a curved surface.  I.e. the curve of the Earth would mean that the angle of reflection off the surface would result in nearly all the light  not reaching the observer's eyes. The fact that, if this was how reflections worked, that the same would be true on a flat Earth seems to have escaped Dubay's notice. This type of reflection is called specular reflection, and takes place with mirror like surfaces.  Generally the surface of the water is not perfectly flat so the reflection of the light...
Read more

Debunking Eric Dubay's 200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball

Image
Conspiracy Baloney aims to provide resources to counter to the influence of the crazy anti-science conspiracy theories that are out there. This blog is specifically to debunk Eric Dubay's " 200 proofs the earth is not a spinning ball", that I have found flat earthers often cite. There are quite a few resources out there that comprehensively debunk this book, but I think that one more voice can only help.  I have tried to keep the rebuttals as non technical as possible. Eric Dubay’s proofs are laughably simplistic and demonstrate an almost complete lack of understanding of maths and anything scientific or technical. A list of "proofs" that show Dubay is an idiot He also likes to give historical quotes as proofs.  Typical are quotes from the 1800’s but he even has one from before 1600!.  Not only are these opinions not proof of anything, but the fact that he can’t provide quotes from more up to date sources destroys their credibility. Worse, ...
Read more

1. The horizon always appears flat

Image
“The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.” Lazy thinking Our eyes are forward facing, with a very narrow field of vision.  While we can detect things in our peripheral vision what we see is very vague.  However we “feel” that we see a lot more than we do because our mind builds a more panoramic picture for us. Source:  https://www.eyehealthweb.com/peripheral-vision/ Think of the panoramic picture Apps that you can get for smartphones.  You take a narrow picture, then turn and take another and repeat.  The App then stitches these pictures together into one panoramic picture.  For us, our eyes are constantly moving left and right and it is our brain that is stitching together ...
Read more